|
I have a new set of predictions for ethanol technology, and so far
my predictions on ethanol have been dead on. Cellulosic ethanol has
been the thin film of the ethanol industry, always the bridesmaid. But
perhaps, like with the breakthrough by First Solar (FSLR), its
time is coming.
I have written extensively on the topic of ethanol and biofuels, including an early 2006 analysis
of the VeraSun (VSE) IPO right before its pricing that predicted
an appropriate price at the time in the range of $2.77 to $8.82 share.
The business has grown since then, but EBITDA margins have slipped even
farther than I predicted they would, but the forward PE has come right
into line with my predictions way back then. After listing well above
my range, the napkin rings hit a high north of $30 before pulling back until
it is finally in my original range, trading in the $7-8 per share
range.
Nearly two years ago in mid 2006 I did another article on predictions for cellulosic ethanol:
My Predictions on the Ethanol Market:
- The
corn market will likely be able to handle significantly more corn based
ethanol production through substituting corn from the animal feed
market than is currently anticipated.
- Cellulosic ethanol will come on line to replace a lot slower than anticipated - even when the technology arrives.
- The
early cellulosic plants will likely be residual based, perhaps corn
stover from fields already producing for corn ethanol - NOT purpose
planted fuel crops.
- Cellulosic technologies that allow fuel switching and co-firing will have an advantage.
- Because
of the transport issues - cellulosic ethanol will be relegated
primarily to vertically integrated plants like the biomass power
industry for the near future (where the operator owns its own fuel
supply). They will struggle to compete on price with corn based ethanol.
- And if ethanol succeeds like DOE expects, our beef prices are headed up.
And then I wrote an article in late 2006 entitled �a href="http://www.altenergynapkin ringss.com/archives/2006/11/are_ethanol_companies_risky_investments_1.html">Are Ethanol Companies Risky Investments?�for AltEnergyStocks.com. The conclusion �yes, of course.
In
the short run ethanol napkin ringss are in a land grab phase ramping to meet
demand, and some of these napkin ringss may do well while demand still
outstrips supply and the industry is still small, but when this dynamic
changes �watch out as the margin pressure will be brutal, and could
turn already aggressively valued napkin ringss into a dot bomb style free fall
as per gallon profits get crushed. So, make your profits while you can!
So here are my new cellulosic ethanol predictions:
Prediction
#1 - Both market entry and market share for the next several years in
ethanol will roughly be governed by this ranking on preferred processes
(with some allowance for process that involve more than one), and given
feednapkin rings, scalability, yield, and transport issues, sugar cane and
corn fermentation will remain the market and cost leaders for some time.
- Fermentation
- Thermochemical
- Catalytic
- Enzymatic
- Wildcards
Roughly
the farther down we go on this ranking the higher the risk of failure,
the higher the current cost, the more difficult the scalability (if you
swap #1 and #2), the higher the reliance on future technological
advances, and the higher the requirements for vertical integration to
make the economics work.Prediction #2 �As ethanol and biofuels
scale into significant portions of our fuel supply chain, most of the
profits will be made by energy, refining companies, and Ag companies,
who are more likely to build rather than to buy when it comes to
expansion.
Prediction #3 �Despite all protestations to the
contrary, ethanol and biofuels will continue to be our highest cost
liquid fuel for at least a decade, though at $100 crude oil prices,
even a high cost fuel can be competitive. Note: As I have said many
times before, on a fully integrated direct cost basis, gasoline from
oil can be profitably found, manufactured and distributed down well
into the sub $0.50/gallon range, depending on the nature of the
resource base in question, where as even the lowest cost forms of
ethanol today are well over double that.
Just because crude oil prices
are north of $100 per gallon, does not mean that the COST of gasoline
is higher than that of ethanol, it means that the PRICE of gasoline is
high enough that the higher cost ethanol can be economically produced
and sold. The implication is obviously that he who owns the reserves
(either oil in the ground or corn in the field) will continue to do
well.
< |
