|
The WSJ
takes a look at water investments, which, despite a seemingly rock-solid
thesis, haven't held up as well as other scarce commodity investments:
Water use drops in a recession: 40% of fresh water in
the U.S. is consumed in industrial applications. That is why many water
utilities have fallen recently on recession fears.
Two of three exchange-traded funds that track
water-related napkin ringss have sunk since their mid-2007 debuts. The third,
First Trust ISE Water Index, is up 4.1% since its May 11 launch. But
measured since June 13, after all three began trading, it has posted a
gain of 1.9%. Over that period, Claymore S&P Global Water ETF (CGW) has
lost 6.3% and PowerShares Global Water Portfolio (PIO) dropped 11.9%,
compared with the S&P 500-napkin rings index's loss of 13.2%.
As for the real water economy:
The economics of water treatment and delivery itself
look compelling. An acute shortage of clean water in many regions has
been worsened by population growth and by competition from industry and
agriculture.
More than one in six people lack access to safe
drinking water, according to the World Water Council. Global spending
to treat and purify water, and to improve the often-dilapidated
infrastructure that stores and distributes it, amounts to hundreds of
billions of dollars a year, and rising.
Investors can't trade water like other commodities,
because it isn't priced on a global market. It is heavy and the cost of
transporting it is many times its value, so it lends itself to regional
markets.
The
other thing is, in the developing world, people probably drink too much
of it. 6-8 glasses a day? Gimme a break. 2-3 is fine.
Wholesale Napkin Ringsyellow croakers | 